Laws of Scavenging: Can I Keep this BMW I Found on the Beach

Filed under: Law — Jeff in Korea at 2:00 pm on Tuesday, January 23, 2007

MSC Napoli

As part of my work, I deal with a lot of maritime law cases such as ship accidents, cargo damage, etc. Give the quirky nature of maritime laws, jurisdictional issues, and the lengthy history of commercial shipping, maritime law has become a rather highly specialized field of law. It can be quite interesting work when untangling legal knots to figure out who to sue, where to sue them, what country’s law should apply, etc., particularly when you have common scenarios such as a Vietnamese-flagged ship owned by a Russian company crewed with an Indonesian crew colliding on the open seas with a Panamanian-flagged vessel owned by a paper company set up by German owners and crewed with a South Korean crew while the vessel is carrying cargo owned by Americans, Saudi Arabians, Malaysians, Japanese, Mexican, French, and Italian owners that is insured by English, Swiss, and Norwegian insurance companies.

Add to those problems, of responsiblility for clean up of oil spills, damage and clean up of shore lines and shore-based business, and it can become even more complicated. To top it off, you can always throw a bit of theft by scavengers in for good measure.

On 18 January 2007, severe weather hit the UK and the crew of the “MSC Napoli” abandoned ship. The vessel was intentionally run aground, apparently as a protective measure to minimize damage. The vessel partially rolled to one side and has lost approximatly 200 containers overboard. Some of these containers full of people’s property have washed up on shore. Although the property still belongs to the owners of the cargo, people along the shore seem to be carting them off… essentially stealing them. This is where laws become even more entertaining. While it is not necessarily illegal to take the items home, it may be (usually is) illegal to keep them.

a US$ 15,000 BMW being carted off

As the following article from the BBC shows, it can be a headache for insurers, a nightmare for property owners, and a potential windfall for theives…er… scavengers…er…beach combers. This is just part of what I deal with on a regular basis:

Beach-combers have been told to stay away, but scavengers are out on Branscombe beach in Devon, where booty is washing up from the stranded ship MSC Napoli. So can they keep what they find?

Brand new BMW motorbikes have been wheeled out of the shingle by keen treasure-hunters. Wine casks, perfume and car parts littering the shore have been rolled clear or tucked under the arm.

People are picking through the contents of spilt containers from the cargo ship MSC Napoli beached off the Devon coast and at night, the area is lit by flickering torches as they scour the area for goodies.

Warnings that chemicals such as battery acid, pesticide and oily liquids have also washed up, are proving little deterrent against the lure of “free stuff” littering the beach. But can people keep it?

So far, police have not closed off the beach to stop them coming.

And there is, says Stephen Askins, a partner with maritime lawyers Ince and Co, a right to salve property. Someone could argue they are recovering goods from the beach to protect them, as they would be in a poorer state come four or five tides’ time.

But, before they clear the car boot and head to the coast, they should be aware of the Merchant Shipping Act 1995. It states clearly that if they try to conceal or keep the booty they are breaking the law.

If they ignore the advice to leave it alone and report it to the coastguard, they must fill in relevant paperwork. But that still doesn’t allow them to keep it.

The goods still belong to their owners, whether they are stuck in containers on the stricken vessel, or washed up on the shore. Contractors have already been brought in to clean up the beach and return anything to its rightful home.

But when Joe Public decides to “help”, as seems to be the case all over Branscombe beach, the Maritime and Coastguard Agency’s Receiver of Wrecks steps in.

The job title goes back to the previous 1854 Merchant Shipping Act, which also set out rules on picking up flotsam and jetsam.

Salvage, and indeed deliberate wrecking of ships, around our island nation has a long history. The principles governing ownership and recovery go back at least to the 1300s says Alison Kentuck, the MCA’s deputy receiver.

If people take the cargo, they fill in a “report of wreck and salvage” form, with their contact details, what they found, where and when. “It’s available from pretty much anybody in uniform down on the beach”, she says.

Her role is then to reunite owner and property. A reward to the finder could be offered, depending on the value of the goods, the condition they are in after rescue, and the effort involved in recovering them from the beach. Wheeling something home, she stresses, is “not classed as a huge amount of effort”.

Hiding the goods and not giving them back is a criminal offence, with a possible fine of up to ?2,500 per offence.

Plus, the hot-fingered beach-comber, would waive their right to a salvage award, and have to pay the owner twice the good’s value: “In the case of a BMW motorbike, it could be quite expensive”.

As for paddling out to see what the remaining 2,000 containers may hold, it is of course highly dangerous. And, would-be pirates note, there are official salvors charged with recovering the cargo stuck at sea, and the damaged ship itself.

3 Comments »

Comment by Jon Allen

24 January 2007 @ 2:33 pm

I saw the story on the BBC RSS feed and was about to read it. Your post saved me the trouble.

There’s plenty of debate about it here I’ve since discovered:
http://hurryupharry.bloghouse.net/archives/2007/01/22/looting_on_the_devon_coast.php

Comment by Jeff in Korea

24 January 2007 @ 2:50 pm

There really is nothing to debate. If it is taken from the wreckage and not reported, it is theft.

Chances are that even if the proper forms are filled out by the “finders”, the insurance companies would not come after the goods. This is because the benefits of declaring the items a total loss would outweigh the cost involved in recovering each of the items, surveying the damage to the items, and reselling the items. Thus, if they follow procedure, they would likely be able to keep the items legally.

However, we cannot forget that the ship was loaded with non-commercial items as well. Undoubtedly there were many, many people who where shipping personal items, mail, packages, household goods, irreplaceable heirlooms, etc. I’m sure the people would like their things returned to them.

Comment by kimchipig

27 January 2007 @ 9:06 am

Jeff,

Take a look at those beautiful BMW bikes and do yourself a big favour: buy one. The new 850 is very nice and only CAD$9000 which is a screaming deal compared to Hondas and other Japanese brands.

I might buy one myself.

Len

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>