Bush v Kerry: Round 3

Filed under: Uncategorized — Jeff in Korea at 10:19 am on Thursday, October 14, 2004

Bush scores on health care: “A plan is not a litany of complaints.”

Kerry keeps bringing up McCain…He is aware that McCain supports Bush, isn’t he?

Bush scores again on Kerry’s promise to not raise taxes: “His rhetoric doesn’t match his record. In 20 years, he voted to increase taxes 98 times…He has proposed 2.2 trillion dollars in new spending.”

Kerry smirks….Bush smirks back.

Bush scores again on taxes: “We are not spending the government’s money. We are spending YOUR money.”

Bush scores more points with: “There is a mainstream of American politics and you are on the far left bank…. Ted Kennedy is the Conservative senator from Mass.”
D’oh Bush shouldn’t have laughed after that line. It was forced and he laughed alone.

Kerry loses BIG TIME bringing Cheney’s lesbian daughter into the debate. Idiot. Liberal Paul Begala agrees with me. So does Robert Novak.

Kerry comes out in open defiance of the Catholic Church. That must take guts.

Bush makes a joke that goes something like this.”Well I’m not sure that it’s a good idea to quote major new media on things like…………….er….well…..nevermind.” BAM That one blew up in his face.

Kerry is strong and forceful, but so negative.

BUSH HITS A PERSONAL HOMERUN ON IMMIGRATION: “I do not support amnesty. We shouldn’t reward people for illegal behavior. There are plenty of people standing in line and doing it the right way.” YES!!!! EXACTLY!!!

Ugh. this boring.

Why does Kerry keep bringing up McCain? Twice in one answer? Bush needs to point out that McCain supports him.

Bush finally mentioned that McCain supports him.

Bush knocks it out of the part on the last question about what they have learned from the strong women in their lives. Bush says, “[I’ve learned] To listen to them. To stand up straight and not scowl. (much laughter)….She speaks better English than I do. (more and louder laughter).”

I call this one a draw. Bush was very weak at the beginning. Kerry was strong but mean and negative. Bush got up to speed and hit his stride about 30 minutes into the debate. Kerry continued his negativity throughout the debate. He continued to bring up McCain and Cheney’s lesbian daughter. Bush keep making bad, scripted jokes. All around, it was a pretty poor performance on both sides.

8 Comments »

Comment by zecks

14 October 2004 @ 4:53 pm

The Chimp in Chief got spanked bad, again. Spin away, he’s a moron and you know it.

Comment by Julie

14 October 2004 @ 8:39 pm

i thought Bush did well this round; much better than I’d feared after Round One and Round Two.
On this one, it’s my monarchal opinion that Bush walked away with it.

Comment by CTDeLude

14 October 2004 @ 10:41 pm

You notice all the people with snide comments (and usually of the Left) never put any kind of contact information out there?

I found it…curiously funny.

Comment by Scott Sommers

15 October 2004 @ 12:41 am

I didn’t watch the debate, so it seems strange that everywhere I look, the media is saying Kerry took the debate and the polls are way up for him. I come here, and the impression is that Bush whacked him. I know this is a personal blog, but why is it that here I only read good things about Bush?

Comment by Scott-in-Japan

15 October 2004 @ 11:10 am

Scott S - “…why is it that here I only read good things about Bush?”
The American media is heavily biased to The Left. As in 92% biased against Bush. And just to make you happy, yes, there is a poll
(^_^)
Some papers (like USA Today, I believe) reported on it heavily a few months back. So while there is no ‘conspiracy’ to not report good news on Bush - there is a horribly strong correlation between being an American reporter and being anti-Bush.

Jeff - Bush did seem to have improved a bit compared to his previous speeches, but that’s not saying much (unfortunately). He seemed to have been really trying during his closing comments, and (for him) made progress on being a dynamic speaker.

>”… Kennedy is the Conservative senator from Mass.”
>D’oh Bush shouldn’t have laughed after that line. It was forced and
>he laughed alone.
The home audience laughed along with that one. Well…more precisely we paused, then yelled, “BURN!”

“Kerry comes out in open defiance of the Catholic Church. That must take guts.”
It takes almost zero guts right now. Aside from white people, Catholicsm ranks high on the “OK To Offend” list. Folks are very forgiving of others ripping on Catholics right now, even Jay Leno makes some serious jabs that are not taken offensively. Because being anti-Cathlocism isn’t taken as anti-Catholic-dogma right now. And typical for a Kerry remark, people will understand what they want to hear - not what the liar actually said.

Comment by Brian

15 October 2004 @ 1:00 pm

CTDeLude,

Come visit my blog where I have a whole mob of wingnuts leaving snide comments and no contact information.

Jeff, I wish Kerry would stop mentioning McCain as well. Despite his heroic background, he’s turned into a chump for the Republican party… calling Bush out on his BS one day but then campaigning for him the next. IF he had any integrity he’d be campaigning for Kerry right now.

Brian

Comment by Jeff in Korea

15 October 2004 @ 1:29 pm

Brian,

The same could be said for Kerry’s running mate. Given the things Edwards said about Kerry during the primaries, Edwards should be campaigning for Bush and not running with Kerry against Bush and the guy with the lesbian daughter.

Comment by Brian

16 October 2004 @ 9:25 pm

Jeff,

Did Kerry’s camp ever accuse Edwards of fathering illegitimate children and of being the “fag candidate”? Because that’s what the Bush team did to McCain in South Carolina.

So I stand by what I said… Bush’s tactics against McCain in 2000 crossed the line, and McCain only demeans himself even more by now standing by that guy.

Brian

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>