Calm Before the Storm?

Filed under: Politics — Jeff in Korea at 1:56 am on Saturday, March 20, 2004

LATEST UPDATE: As of 7:00 pm, approximately 150,000 people had gathered. by 8:20, the crowed was estimated at 200,000 strong.

Protesters Begin to Gather
Protester Rally agains Roh Impeachment

The idea of a peaceful rally, a non-violent demonstration, or civil protest is a very new think in Korea. It is only in the last several years that marching down the street, signing songs, and sitting in the middle of the street has replaced running down the streest, martial chants, and tearing up the streets and thowing the broken pieces of the street at policemen along with firebombs. Traditionally, large groups of people and large groups of policemen have been a very bad mix. However, in recent years, the violence had died down and people were finding more creative ways to protest in a non-violent way.

All of the warm fuzzies and non-violence suddenly went out the window last year the the very violent demonstrations against the Chilean Free Trade Agreement and against locating a nuclear waste dump in Buan. Those were minor disturbances compared to what could result from this impeachment. Public sentiment seems to be largely against the impeachment, regardless of whether it was lawful or not. Koreans have a long history of rising up quite violently against political oppression and rejection of public opinion. Many people are already comparing the struggle against the impeachment of President Roh to other past struggles against authoritarian and military dictatorships and oppression.

People began holding public demonstrations and candlelight vigils protesting the impeachment. However, once the rallys reached huge proportions, they were declared illegal. One thing that Koreans do not like is to have there political freedoms, particularly their freedom of political speech curtailed. I was relieved to see that the reaction of the huge crowds of people congregating each night backed by more than 200 NGO goups did not immediately turn to violence. The organizers creatively used the legal loophole allowing cultural demonstrations and continued holding the rallies under the pretext of being cultural events.

It took exactly one day for the crafty policemen to realize that it was simply a case of a rose by another name smelling just as sweet. The rallies were again declared illegal on the grounds that they were not really cultural events. The authorities then came out and began threatening to take criminal actions against the organizers and others participating in the illegal rallies and insisting that the law will be followed.

In defiance of the threats, some 2,000 people took to the streets last night to continue the anti-impeachment rallies. Despite continued threats from the government, the rallies are planned to continue.

Tonight, organizers and pundits are estimating that up to 1,000,000 people across the country will participate in rallies tonight in major cities. Conservative estimates put the number to participate in a rally in Seoul at 100,000. Other, more liberal estimates put the expected crowd in Seoul at around 300,000 people. That is a huge, unstable powder keg. It is currently harmless, but it has immeasurable destructive potential, and it only takes one spark. That spark: 9,000 policemen at the Seoul rally.

Tonight and tomorrow are major milestones in the direction that the protests and anti-impeachment effots go. If there is peace this weekend, I think there will be peace until the Constitutional Court renders its decision. If there is violence tonight, it will continue to get worse, and I don’t know where it will end.

Unfortunately, I think its going to get ugly.

11 Comments »

186

Comment by lester

20 March 2004 @ 7:22 pm

ten bucks on the riot police

187

Comment by Blinger

20 March 2004 @ 8:55 pm

I don’t think it will get ugly - the gov’t and the police will continue to bluster around making threats but will do nothing. I have nothing to back this up other than a feeling and a hope.

This impeachment business is all BS. if the constitutional court doesn’t fix it, then there will defineately be violence.

194

Trackback by Kamelian X-Rays

20 March 2004 @ 11:55 pm

South Korean Judicial Politics

The Constitution…is a rock…Let us be done with compromises. Let us go back and stand upon the Constitution.” (A History of the Supreme Court, Bernard Schwartz, p. 108) John Calhoun delivered those words in 1847 when he realized that Congress

188

Comment by Infidel

21 March 2004 @ 12:00 am

The site looks excellent!

As I argue on my site, these gatherings are becoming perfunctory and meaningless. Maturity requires better tactics!

195

Trackback by the laughing linden branch

21 March 2004 @ 12:40 pm

Blogroll Call

Greg at the Crowhill Weblog doubts whether Meditating on “The Passion” will make people like the Latin Mass and wonders whether blogs are a good thing or not. Chrysostomos at skopos focuses in on the current crisis in Kosovo Tim…

196

Trackback by The Marmot's (Final) Hole

21 March 2004 @ 2:39 pm

Million Man March

“The Million Man Demonstration to Annul the Impeachment and Save Democracy” came and went (although there were still people in Gwanghwamun protesting/partying when I came to the office today), and while they didn’t get a million, they did get quite

189

Comment by H. Kim

21 March 2004 @ 4:58 pm

I recently asked all my English-conversation students (a total of about 30 spread out in six different classes ranging in age from 24-40), if they’d ever written a government official, e.g, a national assemblyman, a ministry head, a governor, a mayor, or even Cheongwadae. While many said they were avid netizens and had posted on government and NGO BB’s, or attended mass rallies or protests, not one could say that they had ever personally written a letter of complaint or concern addressed to a government official in their entire lives.

As a person who has fired off untold numbers of letters to elected officials to complain and express concerns throughout my entire life, I was really surprised. Not to brag or anything, but I’ve been contacting my elected representatives since grade school.

My first experience was as a 10-year-old writing Jimmy Carter in the White House for a fourth-grade assignment. That one-paged handwritten letter on wide-ruled notebook paper resulted in a huge envelope arriving on my doorstep three weeks later with a “1600 Pennsylvania Avenue” return address next to a full-color White-House Seal.

Inside the envelope was a letter on official Presidential letterhead signed by Jimmy (I don’t know if it was actually real, but it certainly looked so to a fourth grader), with several official glossy photographs and brochures to boot.

In later years, I wrote letters to various U.S. representatives, senators, legislators as well as state, county and city officials. Most of my letters were written regarding specific issues, to solve problems I was encountering with the bureacracy, and sometimes, just to make my voice heard. Did I get results 100% of the time? No. However, I can say that I did get responses 100% of the time. Can this happen in Korea? I don’t see why not!

Quite honestly, I don’t even know if letter writing would garner the attention of Korean public officials. But as Jimmy Stewart’s character proved in “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington,” letters, mailed en masse to elected officials, tend to make an impression. You could perhaps ignore one bag of mail sitting in your office as a fat-cat National Assemblyman. However, you wouldn’t be able to ignore bags upon bags of constituent letters arriving at a consistent pace day after day after day! You’d have to hire staff to open the letters, and you’d have to make at least a perfunctory effort in responding to them. The bottom line is, letters to public officials pave the way for accountability, and make a statement at the grass roots level that the voice of the people must be heard. Public officials just can’t ignore bags of mail piling up in front of their offices day after day after day, and that’s a certainty — at least in a democracy.

In terms of getting the Korean government’s ear, BB postings in the final analysis are not effective, and are in reality just a black hole of mindless complaints.

Mass demonstrations + street violence, while effective in toppling the military regime back in 1987, have lost the support of the masses, especially the middle class.

Now, 16 years later, we have mass rallies + nonviolent confrontations — basically the same tactics repackaged a’la candlelight vigils and protest songs to boot.

When are Koreans going to wake up that the old tactics don’t work anymore? Koreans keep on insisting ad nauseum they are an “information society”. How ’bout proving it with substance? I daresay that one intelligently written letter to selected national assemblymen and/or ministry officials would do more to express the voice of the people than wasting a lot of energy blocking traffic night after night.

BB postings on government-sponsored or NGO-sponsored message boards can be ignored. Mass rallies can be quelled and are invariably forgotten about soon after their conclusion.

On the other hand, a personally signed and intelligently written letter to a national assemblyman or government minister is the first step in expressing the voice of the people — at least that’s how it’s done in democracies.

Hey Koreans who are interested in advancing democracy in Korea: Instead of marching all over the place and wasting your time, write your elected officials, express your concerns, let them know who you are, and hold them accountable! Wake up people and get smart!

191

Comment by Silly Sally

22 March 2004 @ 3:29 pm

H. Kim,

You are quite the citizen, but think of the “peaceful demonstrations” as a Korean civil-rights movement engaged in class-warfare.

The meaning of the crowds is an ominous message: “No Justice, No Peace.” It’s as peaceful as the quiet North Korean guns pointed at Seoul.

Roh will be re-instated not as a president, but — emperor. Ominously backed by a mobocracy - the reign of terror will make the French revolution look tame. The national blade will fall on many.

192

Comment by H. Kim

22 March 2004 @ 10:02 pm

Silly Sally:
Interesting comments, but I don’t think the current demonstrations have anything to do with “civil rights” or “class warfare”. Making a lot of noise may achieve short-term “nuisance value” concessions, but in a real democracy, such tactics are hardly sustainable in the long view and are at best a quick fix for deep-seated problems. Regardless, your ominous portent of “a reign of terror (that) will make the French revolution look tame” is absurd, as is your prediction of Roh returning as “emperor”. Me thinks you’ve been watching too many Korean soap operas.

193

Comment by Silly Sally

23 March 2004 @ 6:08 pm

H. Kim

Korea is not a democracy.

It is a business-government: Korean private industry in bed with government; designed to drain resources from America — and exploit the Korean masses hypnotized with notions of Korean glory and its vindication.

Roh is a fascist victocrat that Koreans lust after. He taps into the Korean mythology of victimization, giving permission to engage in recreational rage (the true function of anti-Americanism.)

They call him president: but his function after re-instatement will be emperor.

Koreans love nothing more than to be embraced in the motherly arms of a mass-group and shake a fist at the world under the approving eye of a Korean king. Koreans are not made for democracy.

That is all Koreans really want — a chance to smear kimchee over their naked bodies and lop off a few heads — or, realistically, see people jumping off bridges and buildings. It’s a party!

Silly Sally

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>